Skip to main content

Marrying to beat deportation


A Filipina named Imelda (no, not our Imelda), entered the United States legally as a temporary worker. She overstayed the permission given her to remain in the U.S. after repeatedly seeking an extension. Immigration authorities placed her in deportation proceedings. She conceded deportability. The Immigration Judge (IJ) granted her 30 days to depart voluntarily, based partly on her promise not to marry a U.S. citizen during that time.

Eleven days later, she married a U.S. citizen. They had been seeing each other for several months before the deportation hearing. Her husband filed a visa petition on her behalf, and Imelda filed a motion to reopen her deportation hearing to allow consideration of her application for adjustment of status. The IJ denied the motion to reopen because he considered her guilty of "a breach of faith and a misrepresentation” to the Court. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissed her appeal reasoning that neither the equity inherent in her marriage nor the hardship to her citizen spouse was entitled to much weight, because the marriage took place after she had been found deportable.

Imelda appealed to the Court of Appeals arguing that the BIA acted arbitrarily in dismissing her appeal because her case is not factually distinguishable from Matter of Garcia, 16 I. & N. Dec. 653 (BIA 1978), where the BIA established a policy of granting reopening in cases like hers. Like Imelda, the alien in Garcia’s case married a United States citizen and then filed a motion to reopen deportation proceedings to apply for adjustment of status based on marriage, which took place after the alien was found deportable and granted voluntary departure.

In Garcia’s case, the BIA announced this policy: "[W]e shall hereafter generally reopen the deportation proceedings in such cases unless clear ineligibility is apparent in the record... [W]e believe that discretion should, as a general rule, be favorably exercised where a prima facie approvable visa petition and adjustment application have been submitted in the course of a deportation hearing or upon a motion to reopen."

The BIA in Garcia’s case reopened the proceedings solely on the basis of the alien's last-minute marriage to a citizen, and did not require Garcia to show any additional equities. The BIA apparently considered the fact of marriage to a citizen an equity sufficient to warrant reopening. The BIA in Garcia’s case qualified its policy of normally granting reopening in marriage cases by stating that it did not intend to establish an inflexible rule requiring the IJ in all cases to reopen the proceedings. It clearly would not be an abuse of discretion for an immigration judge to summarily deny a motion to reopen upon his determination that the adjustment application would be denied in the exercise of discretion notwithstanding the approval of the petition.

The court said that BIA cannot properly rely on that qualification in this case. The BIA acts arbitrarily when it exercises its discretion to deny a reopening in one case when it has granted a reopening in another factually similar case. The BIA "may not proceed at whim, shedding its grace unevenly from case to case." 

The court held that because this case is virtually identical to the Garcia case, in which the BIA granted the alien's motion to reopen, the BIA acted arbitrarily in treating Imelda differently. Israel v. INS, 785 F.2d 738 (9th Cir. 1986).

*CAUTION: There is no guarantee that an alien’s marriage to a U.S. citizen while in deportation proceedings or after having been ordered deported will result in a visa. Each case is different. Furthermore, this case simply ruled that an alien who marries after having been ordered deported may move to reopen the case for consideration of an adjustment of status application by the IJ. The case did not say that the IJ will approve the application automatically. There is no such thing as “automatic”. Not even “automatic” transmission where the driver still has to shift the gears from “park” to “drive”.


(Atty. Tipon has a Master of Laws degree from Yale Law School and a Bachelor of Laws degree from the University of the Philippines. He specializes in immigration law and criminal defense. Office: 900 Fort St., Suite 1110, Honolulu, HI  96813. Tel. (808) 225-2645. E-Mail: filamlaw@yahoo.com. Website:  www.MilitaryandCriminalLaw.com. He is from Laoag City and Magsingal, Ilocos Sur. He served as an Immigration Officer. He is co-author of “Immigration Law Service, 1st ed.,” an 8-volume practice guide for immigration officers and lawyers. Listen to the most funny, interesting, and useful radio program in Hawaii on KNDI at 1270 AM dial every Thursday at 7:30 a.m. This article is a general overview of the subject matter discussed and is not intended as legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established between the writer and readers relying upon and/or acting pursuant to the contents of this article.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empanada festival: A celebration of good taste and good life

By Dominic B. dela Cruz & Leilanie G. Adriano Staff reporters BATAC CITY—If there is one thing Batac is truly proud of, it would be its famous empanada-making business that has nurtured its people over the years. Embracing a century-old culture and culinary tradition, Batac’s empanada claims to be the best and tastiest in the country with its distinctive Ilokano taste courtesy of its local ingredients: fresh grated papaya, mongo, chopped longganisa, and egg. The crispy orange wrapper and is made of rice flour that is deep-fried. The celebration of this city’s famous traditional fast food attracting locals and tourists elsewhere comes with the City Charter Day of Batac every 23 rd  of June. Every year, the City Government of Batac led by Mayor Jeffrey Jubal Nalupta commemorate the city’s charter day celebration to further promote its famous One-Town, One Product, the Batac empanada. Empanada City The Batac empanada festival has already become an annua

PIDS expert says income tax cuts justified; warns gov’t of revenue loss

Proposals to amend the personal income tax schedule appear to be well-justified. However, these proposals should include measures that will allow government to recover the revenue loss from lower income taxes. Dr. Rosario Manasan, senior research fellow of state think-tank Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), said at a seminar sponsored by the Philippine Senate, that government should look for new revenue measures to compensate for the projected revenue loss that will arise as a result of the implementation of any of the various proposals to restructure the personal income tax. Currently, there are several income tax reform proposals pending in both houses of Congress. All of them, according to Dr. Manasan, have the same objective of addressing the phenomenon of bracket creep, which results from “non-indexation to inflation of personal income tax brackets”. Simply put, bracket creep occurs when employees’ income increases over time as a result of inflation. Th

PGIN honors Ilocano heroes of past, present through Heroes Walk

SPO1 Allan Lampitoc Franco of Banna, Ilocos Norte and PO2 Jovalyn D. Lozano of Adams, Ilocos Norte receive a resolution of commendation, a certificate of college scholarship grant to their family members and a P20,000 cash incentive each from the Provincial Government of Ilocos Norte represented by Governor Imee R. Marcos and Vice Governor Angelo M. Barba in recognition of their bravery and heroic acts in the Mamasapano clash in Maguindanao on January 25. Mr. Franco and Mr. Lozano were recognized on March 10 in time for the unveiling of the second batch of Ilocano heroes at the Heroes Walk located along the Sirib Mile in Laoag City.  (Lei Adriano) By Jennifer T. Pambid PGIN-CMO In honor of the heroes who brought freedom, fame and glory to the province as well as to the country in the past century, the Provincial Government of Ilocos Norte (PGIN) through the Education Department and Sirib Youth Office launched the second batch of Ilocano Heroes Walk on March 10, 2015.