Skip to main content

Remedy for consular visa denial or inaction

Hundreds of visa applications at U.S. consulates abroad are denied for a number of reasons. What should a visa applicant do if his/her application is denied?

The applicant may either ask to reopen the case or move for reconsideration of the denial. When the applicant asks to reopen, the request should be accompanied by new evidence. When the applicant moves for reconsideration, the motion must show that the consul committed factual or legal errors. The best strategy is to ask for both reopening and reconsideration, supporting it with additional documents and legal arguments.

What if the consul does not act on the request to reopen or motion to reconsider for an unreasonable length of time? Can the applicant’s petitioner and the applicant go to court and if so which court?

A Mexican applied for a visa at a U.S. Consulate abroad based on an approved I-130 petition filed by his daughter. The U.S. Consulate denied the Mexican’s visa application. He and his daughter filed a petition in U.S. district court for an order compelling Department of Homeland Security and Department of State officials to act on his Form I-601 (Application for Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility) and his letter requesting reconsideration of the denial of his Visa Application and Alien Registration form.

The district court denied the petition on the ground that the doctrine of consular nonreviewability deprived the court of subject matter jurisdiction to review the consular official’s discretionary decisions. They appealed to the Court of Appeals.

Exceptions to consular nonreviewability
The Court of Appeals said: “Federal courts are generally without power to review the actions of consular officials. Li Hing of Hong Kong, Inc. v. Levin, 800 F.2d 970, 971 (9th Cir. 1986). However, at least two exceptions to this rule exist. First, a court has jurisdiction to review a consular official’s actions “when [the] suit challenges the authority of the consul to take or fail to take an action as opposed to a decision within the consul’s discretion.” Patel v. Reno, 134 F.3d 929, 931–32 (9th Cir. 1997). Second, the court has jurisdiction to review a consular official’s actions when “a U.S. citizen’s constitutional rights are alleged to have been violated by the denial of a visa to a foreigner” without a “facially legitimate and bona fide reason” for the denial. Bustamante v. Mukasey, 531 F.3d 1059, 1060 (9th Cir. 2008).”

The district court correctly concluded that neither of the exceptions to the doctrine of consular nonreviewability applied to the denial of Form I-601. The consular official was required only to accept or reject Form I-601 and he rejected it. Thus, the exception for failure to take action did not apply.

However, the district court erred in finding that the doctrine of consular nonreviewability applied to the consulate inaction on the request for reconsideration because the “facially legitimate and bona fide reason” did not apply to the request for reconsideration since the consulate took no action on the request and thus the “fail to take action” exception applied.

The regulation, 22 CFR § 42.81(e), provides: “If a visa is refused, and the applicant within one year from the date of refusal adduces further evidence tending to overcome the ground of ineligibility on which the refusal was based, the case shall be reconsidered. In such circumstance, an additional application fee shall not be required.”

Once this is done, consular officials have a duty to reconsider a case and must take action. Because 22 C.F.R. § 42.81(e) imposes a nondiscretionary, ministerial duty to reconsider the denial of a visa application when the applicant adduces further evidence tending to overcome the ground of ineligibility, the district court has subject matter jurisdiction under the Mandamus Act where the government fails to comply with the regulation. See 28 U.S.C. § 1361; Patel, 134 F.3d at 931. Moreover, because the consulate’s attention to requests for reconsideration that fall within 22 C.F.R. § 42.81(e) is legally required, that action may be compelled under the Administrative Procedure Act.

The U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded the case to the district court. Rivas v. Napolitano, No. 09-56843, 03/28/13 CA9


(Atty. Tipon has a Master of Laws degree from Yale Law School and a Bachelor of Laws degree from the University of the Philippines. He specializes in immigration law and criminal defense. Office: 800 Bethel St., Suite 402, Honolulu, HI 96813. Tel. (808) 225-2645. E-Mail: filamlaw@yahoo.com. Websites:  www.MilitaryandCriminalLaw.com. He is from Laoag City and Magsingal, Ilocos Sur. He served as an Immigration Officer. He is co-author of “Immigration Law Service, 1st ed.,” an 8-volume practice guide for immigration officers and lawyers. Listen to the most funny, interesting, and useful radio program in Hawaii on KNDI at 1270 AM dial every Thursday at 7:30 a.m. This article is a general overview of the subject matter discussed and is not intended as legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established between the writer and readers relying upon and/or acting pursuant to the contents of this article.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empanada festival: A celebration of good taste and good life

By Dominic B. dela Cruz & Leilanie G. Adriano Staff reporters BATAC CITY—If there is one thing Batac is truly proud of, it would be its famous empanada-making business that has nurtured its people over the years. Embracing a century-old culture and culinary tradition, Batac’s empanada claims to be the best and tastiest in the country with its distinctive Ilokano taste courtesy of its local ingredients: fresh grated papaya, mongo, chopped longganisa, and egg. The crispy orange wrapper and is made of rice flour that is deep-fried. The celebration of this city’s famous traditional fast food attracting locals and tourists elsewhere comes with the City Charter Day of Batac every 23 rd  of June. Every year, the City Government of Batac led by Mayor Jeffrey Jubal Nalupta commemorate the city’s charter day celebration to further promote its famous One-Town, One Product, the Batac empanada. Empanada City The Batac empanada festival has already become an annua

PIDS expert says income tax cuts justified; warns gov’t of revenue loss

Proposals to amend the personal income tax schedule appear to be well-justified. However, these proposals should include measures that will allow government to recover the revenue loss from lower income taxes. Dr. Rosario Manasan, senior research fellow of state think-tank Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), said at a seminar sponsored by the Philippine Senate, that government should look for new revenue measures to compensate for the projected revenue loss that will arise as a result of the implementation of any of the various proposals to restructure the personal income tax. Currently, there are several income tax reform proposals pending in both houses of Congress. All of them, according to Dr. Manasan, have the same objective of addressing the phenomenon of bracket creep, which results from “non-indexation to inflation of personal income tax brackets”. Simply put, bracket creep occurs when employees’ income increases over time as a result of inflation. Th

PGIN honors Ilocano heroes of past, present through Heroes Walk

SPO1 Allan Lampitoc Franco of Banna, Ilocos Norte and PO2 Jovalyn D. Lozano of Adams, Ilocos Norte receive a resolution of commendation, a certificate of college scholarship grant to their family members and a P20,000 cash incentive each from the Provincial Government of Ilocos Norte represented by Governor Imee R. Marcos and Vice Governor Angelo M. Barba in recognition of their bravery and heroic acts in the Mamasapano clash in Maguindanao on January 25. Mr. Franco and Mr. Lozano were recognized on March 10 in time for the unveiling of the second batch of Ilocano heroes at the Heroes Walk located along the Sirib Mile in Laoag City.  (Lei Adriano) By Jennifer T. Pambid PGIN-CMO In honor of the heroes who brought freedom, fame and glory to the province as well as to the country in the past century, the Provincial Government of Ilocos Norte (PGIN) through the Education Department and Sirib Youth Office launched the second batch of Ilocano Heroes Walk on March 10, 2015.